December 13, 2011 6:07
pm
US companies blame unemployment on skills gap
By Hal Weitzman in Chicago and Robin Harding in
Washington
Drew Greenblatt has been looking for more than a year for three sheet-metal
set-up operators to work day, night or weekend shifts.
The president of Marlin Steel Wire Products, a company in Baltimore with 30
employees, Mr Greenblatt says his inability to find qualified workers is
hampering his businessfs growth. gIf I could fill those positions, I could raise
our annual revenues from $5m to $7m,h he says.
He is offering a salary of more than $80,000 with overtime, including health
and pension benefits. Yet in spite of extensive advertising, he has had no
qualified applicants. He is trying to train some of his unskilled staff but says
none has the ability or drive to complete the training.
Mr Greenblattfs predicament speaks to one of the biggest economic debates
about todayfs 8.6
per cent US unemployment rate: is it merely a cyclical problem that will
shrink as demand recovers? Or is it something deeper and more structural, a
gmismatchh between the skills workers have and those companies need?
The idea there is something structurally wrong with the US workforce is
controversial among economists but has a certain resonance with the public.
Since the emergence of Japan as a technology and manufacturing powerhouse in the
1970s, Americans have been anxiousthat they were losing their competitive edge
to better-educated, harder-working rivals.
Economists trying to figure out whether unemployment is cyclical or
structural have turned to what they call the
Beveridge curve: the relationship between unemployment and the job vacancy
rate.
Vacancies, the number of unfilled positions, have risen by 35 per cent since
their trough in June 2009 – but the unemployment rate has remained stubbornly
high. If there are jobs but people are not filling them, it may be because their
skills are not up to scratch, say those who fear structural unemployment.
But a preponderance of economists argue this is a misreading of the data. A
recent San Francisco Fed paper finds that vacancies are high relative to hiring
across a broad range of industries, including those such as construction, where
recent job cuts mean that there is most unlikely to be a skills shortage.
The authors suggest companies may not be trying very hard to fill jobs, while
workers in receipt of unemployment insurance may not be trying that hard to find
them.
Policy
moves by the US Federal Reserve reflect a view that most unemployment is not
the result of a skills mismatch. But even those who believe that todayfs
unemployment problem is primarily cyclical say closing the gskills gaph noted by
Mr Greenblatt will be essential if Americans are to enjoy stable work and rising
wages.
Ben
Bernanke, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, told an audience in Jackson Hole,
Wyoming, in August that the US had to gfoster the development of a skilled
workforceh if it was to enjoy good longer-term prospects. The US education
system gdespite considerable strengths, poorly serves a substantial portion of
our population,h he said.
US companies that are growing say an unqualified workforce is already a
significant barrier to hiring.
In a September poll of owners of fast-growing, privately held US companies
undertaken by the non-profit Kauffman Foundation, the inability to find
qualified workers was cited as the biggest obstacle to growth. Some 40 per cent
of respondents said they were being held back by the skills gap, compared with
just 13 per cent by lack of demand.
Advanced Technology Services (ATS), a manufacturing equipment maintenance
company based in Peoria, Illinois, whose clients include Caterpillar, BorgWarner, Honeywell, Eaton and Textron, is finding it tough to fill the 160 job openings it
has available for roles such as maintenance and machine technicians.
The companyfs revenues grew by 35 per cent last year and are on course for 25
per cent growth this year. But Jeff Owens, chief executive, says it could expand
faster if it could find qualified workers more quickly. gIn other businesses the
capacity constraint is buildings, plant or equipment,h he says. gIn our
business, a service business, itfs people.h
US manufacturers have 600,000 unfilled positions because of a lack of
qualified skilled workers, according to a report released in October by
Deloitte, the consultants, and the National Association of Manufacturers, an
industry body.
Jill Bellak, chief operating officer of MBX, a company in suburban Chicago
that makes computer hardware, says the fast-growing business is finding it tough
to find good software engineers, production workers and salespeople to add to
its 78-strong workforce.
gYou hear how high unemployment is and you think it would be easy to hire,
but companies have tended to cut their lower performers and retain their best
people,h says Ms Bellak. gMeanwhile, talented people are less inclined to leave
their current positions than they would be in good times.h
In manufacturing, the skills problem dates at least to the 1970s and 1980s,
when companies began automating factories and outsourcing production. As a
result, manufacturers found they did not have jobs for the people leaving their
in-house training programmes, some of which were then scrapped.
Some big manufacturers still train in-house, including Boeing, the aerospace manufacturer, which spends $80m a year
on training its existing workforce. But not all do. gTechnology moves fast and
most companies donft have the money or resources to pay for extensive
retraining,h said Sir James Dyson, the British household appliances
engineer.
Without in-house training programmes, companies have often been left looking
for staff with specific skills. gA generation ago, employers would hire and
train employees. Now, they demand trained workers,h says Peter Cappelli, a
professor of management at the University of Pennsylvaniafs Wharton business
school.
gThe skills gap is largely a figment of companiesf imagination,h says Mr
Cappelli. gThey cannot find workers to do the very specific tasks they want
done. That is different from not being able to find capable workers.h
Companies counter that todayfs jobs require a broad set of skills, and that
the US educational system is not producing workers with the flexibility they
need.
gWe have a training programme, but if someone applies for a job and doesnft
have basic math, I donft have the wherewithal to teach them basic math,h says
Charles Cannon, chief executive of JBT, a maker of food-processing machinery and airport
equipment.
American 15-year-olds ranked 25th among the 34 developed countries in the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in maths, 17th in science
and 14th in reading ability, according to a 2009 OECD study.
Many companies are realising they need to take the initiative in
collaborating with educational institutions. Martin Swarbrick, chief executive
of Bison Gear & Engineering, a Chicago manufacturer with 250 staff that
makes industrial motors, says his company has had such a programme in place for
years and it has helped him offset the skills gap.
gWefve done a lot of promoting from within,h he says. gA lot of our people
started on the shop floor and now theyfre completing their Masters
degrees.h
Copyright The
Financial Times Limited 2011.